|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
| Martin's new Sci-Fi/Fantasy Hit now in print! Read about & order "Prisoner of Time" right here. |
| Visit Martin's Official Website: www.martiningham.com! |
| Read more of Martin T. Ingham's articles: Martin's 2009 Archive (New!) Martin's 2008 Archive Read Martin's 2007 Archives! Martin's 2006 Archives! His 2005 Archives! The 2004 Archives! |
In my various political endeavors, I have encountered a growing trend among public servants. Town Clerks, Vote Registrars, Poll Workers, and other officials involved in election affairs are more and more likely to decline the chance to sign a citizens' petition, under the auspices of their need to remain "impartial." While I understand the logic, I cannot agree with it, and after much thought I have found it to be quite troublesome.
When someone refuses to put their name on a petition, they are essentially saying that they are in opposition to it, or otherwise don't want it on the ballot. That is how the average voter takes it, at least, and after any lengthy explanation to the contrary there will always be doubt in their heads. The voter will either think less of the particular petition, or less of the person refusing to sign it.
I'm a man who believes in certain absolutes. In many cases, things are black or white, yes or no, right or wrong, good or evil. There is no "gray" area for impartiality when it comes to the truly important issues of the day. You are either for something or against it. To what degree and in what manner are the only variables, but you are still either in favor or in opposition to some degree.
I don't want to insult any town clerks or other elections officials out there, but I fear you are abandoning your own rights under false pretenses. You think you must hide your allegiance, and pretend to have no opinion on matters that you have every right to care about, and likely do feel strongly about one way or another. You should not refuse to support a petition you agree with, because by refusing you are, in effect, rejecting it. Where is the logic in that?
Election workers are not jurors, and petitions are not defendants or plaintiffs in a courtroom. There is no need for public servants to be impartial when it comes to a simple matter of signing their name to put something on the ballot. I say to every such official in Maine, and across America; if you agree with a petition, sign it. If not, refuse, but don't hide behind the paper curtain of impartiality. There is no such thing when it comes to such matters of public interest. Do not act as if you are ashamed of your beliefs, and don't be afraid to sign a petition that you believe in. If you honestly oppose a petition, admit it, but don't refuse to sign out of some imaginary need to be impartial. You did not lose any of your Constitutional Rights when you accepted your noble positions in public life. You can still conduct yourselves in a fair and civil manner and retain your right to say yes or no to signature gatherers. Please do every citizen the honor and courtesy of exercising those rights. Sign, or don't, but don't abstain.
As a concluding aside, I fear that it is mostly Conservative workers who have adopted this belief that they must be impartial. I have encountered left-leaning poll workers, and they are never reluctant to voice their opinion on issues or sign their names to the causes they support. This is another reason Conservatives are handicapped in the political arena. We are not playing by the same rules as the left. We hide and try to be polite, while the opposition is shouting from the rooftops. It has to stop, and we must not be afraid to stand up for our beliefs.
Martin Ingham's next regularly scheduled column is due to appear soon. Be sure to check back for more insight!
Help Martin's readership expand! email a friend this page today, or print out a page of promotional cards HERE, and distribute them in your area!
As we get deeper into 2009, and the leftist legislature in Augusta continues to advance more corrupt, socialist policies, I have wondered whether I should bother running in 2010. In my ponderings, I have to wonder if I really could be a "representative," considering what passes for representation these days. I still believe I'd do a good job, but I'm not sure I could get elected due to my recent rhetoric against the immorality of modern society.
My recent rant against drug use may adversely impact my chances. It seems a lot of my fellow citizens around here are addicts, and they won't vote for someone like myself, who doesn't share their love of weed, speed, smack, crack, meth, and whatever else gets you high. "Just say no" has become "just say yes," apparently.
To a lesser degree, my opposition to Gay Marriage may also weaken my chances, as a lot of Mainers seem to desire this perversion of the law. Many of my fellow citizens who are not even gay still think the sodomites should be allowed to co-opt the legal system and rewrite laws to suit their deviant sexual practices. As a believer in "one-man, one-woman" marriage, I guess I'm just too offensive.
My desire to see taxes cut is another area that might cause a problem. It seems so many of my neighbors love taxes. Even though they complain about high taxes, they don't seem to really care to lower them. They want more from government in the way of special services and free handouts, and they vote for every bond issue on the ballot. Government mismanages all of its programs, and demands higher taxes to pay for things, but when given a choice too many voters say yes to taxation, rather than no to greedy government. Fiscally responsible candidates are doomed unless they sell-out and promise more freebies from the public coffers. Yep, I'm screwed again!
Immigration is a subject where I'm hammered from both sides. I'm not black or white on this issue, as seems to be the common case these days. I don't believe in mass deportations, nor do I believe in blanket amnesty. I do believe in throwing out the convoluted, red-tape-plagued immigration laws, which are unfair to everyone, and simplifying the law, so everyone can understand it. Those who truly want to be Americans and desire a shot at the American dream should be given a chance without having to jump through bureaucratic hoops. At the same time, we need laws to get rid of riff-raff who don't want to assimilate and become Americans. Oh, how mean-spirited and reckless of me! I guess that pleases nobody.
It seems all the beliefs and behaviors that make me a better person make me a weaker candidate. It is the sad truth of modern politics. The more immoral and flawed a person is, the more they seek to promote pervasive government, and the more they hide what they believe, the more chance they seem to have of winning. Maybe these immoral, sleazy politicians are simply more skilled at conning the voters, but how many times must the electorate get burned before they wake up?
| NCA Mainpage |